By Emily Rose

By Emily Rose
Photo By Emily Rose

Thursday, April 14, 2016

REVIEW | Renegade's "The Birds" Reaches High Despite Challenging Script October 09, 2015



by DENNIS KEMPTON
It's important to note that "The Birds" as seen on stage at Teatro Zuccone, is not a play about the movie, The Birds--you know, the epic horror film from Alfred Hitchcock, well at least enough horror for its time.  In fact, the winding road to the stage for this work by Irish playwright Conor McPherson begins with the novelette by author Daphne Du Maurier, a British author.  The story was published in 1952 as part of a collection of stories.  And it was that short story that Hitchcock optioned for his movie.  And, it seems, as soon as he optioned the script, he might have said, "The only thing we're keeping here are the birds."
Conor McPherson is a sort of wunderkind director out of University College Dublin.  In 2009, his stage adaptation of "The Birds" debuted at the Gate Theatre, in Dublin.  Although McPherson is an award-winning playwright, "The Birds" is not an award-winning play.  That's not entirely indicative of its merit, mind you.  But, it is telling.
It's not easy to pull off a psychological thriller.  People usually say comedy is the most difficult genre to reproduce on stage, but I disagree.  And first-time director, Zachary Stofer, has his hands full with this 90 minute adaptation of a literary work--where the literary work has so much more ability (and time) to convey terror in the mind of a reader turning pages.
The play begins in the middle of a country house under apocalyptic siege, where Diane (Carrie Mohn) and Nat (Zachary Stofer) find themselves together, but...not together--which is not readily apparent, but soon too obviously apparent--trying to stay out of the clutches of the attacking birds outside their boarded up bunker of a house.  With set design by Evan Kelly, the feeling of the action is claustrophobic and that is the point.  The show is lit by Jon Brophy, with atmospheric success, although there seemed to be a couple of timing inconsistencies with the live candlelight on stage and the necessary compatible lighting needed to see what's going on.
As much as McPherson's script allows, Carrie Mohn gives a mostly solid performance as Diane on stage, especially as she carries the weight of the opening moments.  A tone must be set within the first seconds of her being on stage in order to get the rest of the show on its footing.  Clutching a frying pan, her tortured gasps for breath pull the audience into the show, while the brilliantly concepted sound design by Nicholas Gosen works hand-in-glove with Brophy's spooky live candlelight.  While Mohn flits around on stage like a trapped bird herself, flashes of the candlelight glint off the pan and that's the only way of tracking her movements in the darkened theater.  The effect is palpable and admittedly, the most psychologically thrilling part of the show.
We soon discover Diane is not alone in the house.  Director Zachary Stofer also performs as Nat, apparently having come along some time before in the story, although we're not exactly sure how long.  Stofer is one of the most consistently disciplined and expressive actors in the city, whatever the role.  There are glimpses of his vast talents in this play, but the play itself is not generous with the role.  Fortunately for Stofer, his stage presence and command of his voice and size on stage helps push the character through to some point of connection in a play that doesn't invite much of an emotional connection to any of its characters.  We're briefly trotted through Diane and Nat's respective backstories in a matter of two or three minutes on stage as if McPherson wishes to get those crucial, emotionally pulling nuggets out of the way of the atmosphere.  What's problematic with that is that just as the lighting and sound work hand-in-glove, so too should the characters and the audience.  If there's nobody to fall for, and if there's nobody to care about, how do we terrify people over what's happening?
Stofer and Mohn are good together on the stage, though.  Despite a frustratingly difficult script, they do their due diligence to their roles and that's not to be underestimated.  Mohn especially pulls us through and is, theatrically, the person on stage that pulls it together, as the characters pass through days and nights of emotional terror as Gosen's birds menacingly and relentlessly crash outside, against the door, and everyone around, bringing terror with each tide.
One of the more confusing parts of the show, though, is the arrival of Julia, played by Joslyn Danielson, in her first Renegade show.  During a scene change, she's just...there, without much of an explanation, saved only by a scant device of dialogue between Julia and Diane, later in the action.  Julia is supposed to be the interloper...the intruder between Diane and Nat.  And to do so, she must be cunning.  Danielson doesn't quite get us there and from her first moments on stage, the trio is put off balance when Danielson doesn't seem to exhibit the same emotional response--the timidity and weariness of the claustrophobia--that both Stofer and Mohn so capably convey, especially since Julia is obviously physically wounded.  As Diane changes the bandage on Julia's head, there's an inconsistency in what's going on and what should be going on.  Again, later, when recounting how she found herself inside another house before she arrived upon Diane and Nat's house, she declares that she had never been so frightened in her life--but, Danielson does so with a grin and nonchalance.  Her portrayal of Julia is more petulant and defiant teenager than cunning vamp.  Thankfully for the show's sake, Mohn is the force that pulls their scenes together.  As in the show, Diane is the caretaker and the organizer, so, too, is Mohn, on stage, with this play.
It seems surprising, toward the end of the show, that we realize that Diane has feelings for Nat.  As mentioned before, McPherson's script doesn't allow that to come through, and ultimately, that emotional pull we're supposed to feel between Diane and Nat is unrealized, and the "love-triangle" is expressed in mere dialogue, and only briefly.  And, along the same line, the sexual tension between Nat and Julia is also unrealized--not a fault of the actors, for they have only the script's parameters in which to dwell sexually, or in this case, asexually.
The surprising stand-out is an uncredited appearance by Jack Starr, as the neighbor living in the house across the lake.  In just several minutes on stage, Starr manages to throw a much needed emotional punch into what is happening outside the house.  His fear, his longing is clear and forceful.  And, remarkably, he's able to convey  the spooky humor of a man who's spent too much time alone in what is a truly frightening situation.  Starr's character provides the only dark comedy in the show--in a script that is in some need of it to push the gravity of the situation.  Also, it's important for the audience to have the pressure lifted here and there so the show can layer itself and intensify organically.  If only McPherson's script let us have it, Mohn and Stofer could have knocked it out of the park, since their obvious talents could handle the duty.
Technically, Nicholas Gosen and Jon Brophy deliver in spades.  There's not one hokey moment when it comes to the sound effects and it's apparent Gosen spent much time refining the central unseen character of the entire show.  What the show could have gone without were Diane's voice-overs.  Leaving them out wouldn't have taken away from any of the show's intent or atmosphere.  If anything, it would have enhanced the anxiety of the characters and put a much needed sinister punctuation point on some of Diane's actions, without the intellectual equivocating McPherson is wont to provide--gilding the lily, if you will, unnecessarily. 
For a Renegade Theater Company show, "The Birds" is one worth seeing, though.  Don't let a difficult and time-limited script discourage you from appreciating a couple of great actors doing their best with that they have and with solid and compelling technical elements.  The story in itself is compelling and the historical provenance of the story is enough of a draw to the theater.  It's also a great time of year for a good old-fashioned night of candlelight and spook factor.  And for a first-time director cutting his teeth on a difficult show, ultimately, the effort is a success for Zachary Stofer and that, too, cannot be left out.
Maurier's original short story, interestingly enough, had much to do, metaphorically, with the advent of the Cold War.  These characters, though, are birds themselves, flitting between each other, scratching not only themselves, but those around, trapped within a house and in their own minds, dealing with the psychological terror of the unknown.  So, after you see the play, do the best thing you can do:  read the original story.
THE BIRDS.  Directed by Zachary Stofer for Renegade Theater Company.  WITH Carrie Mohn, Zachary Stofer, Joslyn Danielson, with an applause-worthy appearance by Jack Starr.  The show runs Thursdays through Saturdays with an 8 p.m. curtain through October 24 at Teatro Zuccone, 222 East Superior Street, Duluth.
The show is about 90 minutes and there is no intermission.  This review was based on the Thursday, October 8 opening night performance.
© 2015 Zenith City Style

Sunday, August 9, 2015

My next performance, Coming to Renegade Theater in October 2015

Diane and Tad find themselves
in an abandoned cabin fighting
for survival in what appears to
 be a 'Birdpocalypse'.  How
will it all end?

Vanya & Sonia & MAsha & Spike Review ~ June 5 2015

Check out Durang's Chekhov mash-up

Lawrance Bernabo
For the News Tribune


Each year in the last edition of The Wave we publish a list of memorable moments from what area audiences saw on stage during the year. But I can tell you right here and now that the production of "Vanya & Sonia & Masha & Spike" directed by Julie Ahasay that opened at the Duluth Playhouse on Thursday night is making that list and it is making it at least twice, because Christopher Durang's Tony Award winning play provides not one but two absolute tour de force scenes well worth seeing.


Weary Vanya (John Pokrzywinski) and glum Sonia (Christa Schulz) are a pair of middle-aged siblings living out their unrewarding lives in the family home, when their cleaning woman, Cassandra (Kate Horvath), starts howling dire portents of imminent disaster. Enter Masha (Carrie Mohn), their relentlessly narcissistic movie star sister, and her latest boy toy, the totally buffed Spike (Matthew Smith).


The three siblings are all single (Masha for the sixth time) and were named by their professor parents for characters from Chekhov plays, which pretty much explains why the next door neighbor (Bailey Boots) is named Nina and ends up calling Vanya "Uncle." It also explains why Vanya fears change, why Sonia insists their relatively small collection of cherry trees constitutes an orchard, and why a major plot line has to do with the possible loss of the ancestral home because Masha wants to sell the place.


At this point the pressing question you need answered is: "Do I, average local person who goes to the theatre with some regularity, really know enough about the works of Chekhov to enjoy this play?"

Here is a simple test you can take in the privacy of your own home to answer this question: Name three plays written by Chekov. You get 70 points for the first one you can name, 20 points for the second, and 10 points for the third, for a possible total of 100 points. You can also earn 5 bonus points if you know Chekhov's first name is not Pavel.


Now, to really and truly enjoy "Vanya & Sonia & Masha & Spike" you need to score 0 points--or better--on this test, which, I happen to think, most people can do.

Chekov might provides the dramatic bones of this play, but he does not constitute the comedic musculature. Durang has always been known for mining popular culture in his plays, and there are jokes about everything from Helen Keller and CSV Pharmacy to "Entourage" and the Orestia.


With Cassandra constantly prophesying doom and destruction this show reminded me of "Mighty Aphrodite" as much as it did "A Night in the Ukraine." Granted, the more you know about "The Cherry Orchard," Uncle Vanya," "The Three Sisters" and "The Seagull" the more jokes and oblique references you will get (plus the show's fundamental mash-up of the four plays). But I can assure you those are not where the biggest laughs are in this show. Not even close.


The main sparks in this play are between Sonia and Masha, who are such polar opposites that the only thing they have in common is their knowledge of how to push each other's buttons, which leads to a series of escalating confrontations that conclude in an epic comically competitive crying jag. If Sonia is not the primary character in this cast, then she is the pivotal one. Sonia needs to find her real voice, but she is never going to find it in the company of her siblings. Where she finds it--and whose voice she finds as a substitute in the interim--is one of the chief pleasures of the evening.


Durang must have an affection for the button-down mind of Bob Newhart, because he crafts a wonderful scene that consists entirely of Sonia's side of an unexpected phone call. Schulz has always had one of the most distinctive ways of reading a line of anybody on stage in Duluth, with how she elongates syllables to draw out a word or phrase. In this scene she shows she can do the same thing with silences. Sonia runs the gamut of emotions from A through the vast majority of the alphabet in this scene, and you can read each as it ripples across Schulz's face and her stunningly expressive eyes. There is a moment where Sonia tells a lie and the audience audibly moaned, feeling the character's pain. It is not often that you would describe the applause that follows a scene as being heartfelt, but that is what Schulz earned for her mesmerizing and touching virtuoso performance.


The focus on Sonia and Masha forces Vanya into the background, and you think that the whole point of his character is that being gay essentially makes him the requisite third sister. But then a small spark suddenly makes him explode in a frantic yet encyclopedic rant down memory lane that attacks the value of change. When you reduce the differences between then and now to Halley Mills versus Lindsay Lohan, the past is going to win and win big. Vanya's harangue is exhaustively brilliant and Pokrzywinski masterfully rides the crest of the torrent of words. This is one of those monologues you hear and immediately want to go back and read it over and over again to better appreciate its levels and complexities. I need a copy because I am posting it for my Media & Society students next semester.


Mohn gives Masha a musical lilt to her voice as she prattles on, mostly about herself. I especially liked how she plays Masha's jealousy like a very thin but sharp stiletto. It is dangerously easy to overplay playing a movie star, but Mohn does not come even close to making that mistake so she gets to be the antagonist without becoming the villain. As Spike, Smith is largely required to be eye candy, but he clearly enjoys flaunting what he has in your face (Who knew a reverse strip tease could have its moments?). Spike has a monologue of his own and unfortunately has to contend with a door.


Horvath's Cassandra is a tad demented, as evidenced by her idiosyncratic delivery of her rambling prophecies and the loony look in her eyes, especially when she does the voodoo that she does so well. Then she becomes incredibly droll when it is time for her to deliver the funniest line of the night at Spike's expense. Nina is an aspiring actress, star struck by Masha and unsettled by Spike, but connecting with Vanya. Boots has her big moment when she plays a molecule who has an awful lot to say.


Kevin Seime's impressive set design presents the back patio of this Pennsylvania farm house, wrought of large stones and wooden planks, strategically accented with dashes of red in the form of flowers, seat cushions, and wooden chairs. What little we can see of the farm house's interior is wonderfully detailed for something that is ostensibly off-stage. But then there is even grass growing between the stones on the stairs descending down to the pond, which, it should be pointed out, is essentially where the audience is sitting.

For reasons that will become apparelly apparent--because Kelsie Bigs had to not only come up with costumes but costume costumes for this show--the music that plays is an eclectic collection of Disney covers, most prominently including Louie Armstrong's version of "Whistle While You Work." The play is set in Bucks County, Pennsylvania because that is where Durang lives. There are few things in the script that bind it to the locale, chiefly an inspiring but unattributed quotation from the pen of William Penn.


Walking into this show I was wondering how Durang, who started off writing the likes of "Sister Mary Ignatius Explains It All For You" and "The Actor's Nightmare," finally ended up three-plus decades down the road winning the Tony Award for Best Play in 2013. The answer is found in the pair of stunning showcase moments Durang provides for his actors.


You might start off thinking about Chekhov with this play, but when you leave the theater I can assure you the name on your mind is going to be Maggie Smith.

Vanya & Sonia & Masha & Spike June 2015 Duluth Playhouse













Head shots by Emily Rose 2015



Sunday, February 1, 2015

Next Project

Sonia and Vanya and Masha and Spike by Christopher Durang goes up at
The Duluth Playhouse
  June 4th and runs through the 14th of 2015.  More info to come!